Download the PHP package padosoft/laravel-super-cache-invalidate without Composer

On this page you can find all versions of the php package padosoft/laravel-super-cache-invalidate. It is possible to download/install these versions without Composer. Possible dependencies are resolved automatically.

FAQ

After the download, you have to make one include require_once('vendor/autoload.php');. After that you have to import the classes with use statements.

Example:
If you use only one package a project is not needed. But if you use more then one package, without a project it is not possible to import the classes with use statements.

In general, it is recommended to use always a project to download your libraries. In an application normally there is more than one library needed.
Some PHP packages are not free to download and because of that hosted in private repositories. In this case some credentials are needed to access such packages. Please use the auth.json textarea to insert credentials, if a package is coming from a private repository. You can look here for more information.

  • Some hosting areas are not accessible by a terminal or SSH. Then it is not possible to use Composer.
  • To use Composer is sometimes complicated. Especially for beginners.
  • Composer needs much resources. Sometimes they are not available on a simple webspace.
  • If you are using private repositories you don't need to share your credentials. You can set up everything on our site and then you provide a simple download link to your team member.
  • Simplify your Composer build process. Use our own command line tool to download the vendor folder as binary. This makes your build process faster and you don't need to expose your credentials for private repositories.
Please rate this library. Is it a good library?

Informations about the package laravel-super-cache-invalidate

Laravel Super Cache Invalidate

Laravel Super Cache Invalidate is a powerful package that provides an efficient and scalable cache invalidation system for Laravel applications. It is designed to handle high-throughput cache invalidation scenarios, such as those found in e-commerce platforms, by implementing advanced techniques like event queuing, coalescing, debouncing, sharding, and partitioning.

Latest Version on Packagist CircleCI Quality Score Total Downloads

Table of Contents

Introduction

In high-traffic applications, especially e-commerce platforms, managing cache invalidation efficiently is crucial. Frequent updates from various sources like ERP systems, warehouses, backoffice tools, and web orders can lead to performance bottlenecks if not handled properly. This package provides a robust solution by implementing advanced cache invalidation strategies.

Features

Requires

Installation

Install the package via Composer:

Publish the configuration and migrations:

Run migrations:

Configuration

The package configuration file is located at config/super_cache_invalidate.php. You can adjust the settings to suit your application's needs:

Usage

Inserting Invalidation Events

Use the SuperCacheInvalidationHelper to insert invalidation events:

Processing Invalidation Events

Schedule the processing command to run at desired intervals:

You can add it to your schedule method in App\Console\Kernel.php:

Pruning Old Data

Schedule the pruning command to remove old data:

Architecture and Techniques

Implement an Event Queue for Cache Invalidation

Why: An event queue allows you to collect and process cache invalidation requests asynchronously. It serves as a buffer between the producers of invalidation events (ERP, warehouse, backoffice, web orders) and the cache invalidation logic.

Coalesce Invalidation Events with MySQL

Why: Coalescing helps to merge multiple invalidation events for the same identifier within a specific time window, reducing redundant invalidations.

Implement Debouncing Mechanism

Why: Debouncing prevents the same invalidation from being processed repeatedly in rapid succession.

Handling Associated Identifiers During Invalidation

Why: In complex scenarios, invalidating a cache key or tag may depend on other related tags. For example, when an article is removed from sale, you might need to invalidate both the article's cache and any category pages that include it. Solution:

Implementation:

Benefits:

Sharding and Parallel Processing

Enhancing Parallel Processing with Sharding:

Partitioning Tables

Why: Partitioning improves performance and manageability, especially for large tables.

Semaphore Locking with Redis Implementing Semaphores to Prevent Overlapping:

Why: Prevent multiple processes from processing the same shard simultaneously. How:

Performance Optimizations

More in depth

Event Queue for Cache Invalidation in Depth

In modern, high-traffic applications—especially those in the e-commerce sector—the rate at which data changes can be overwhelming. Products go out of stock, prices fluctuate, new items are added, and descriptions are updated. These changes often originate from multiple sources such as ERP systems, warehouse updates, backoffice operations, and customer activities like web orders. Each of these changes necessitates updating or invalidating cache entries to ensure that users always see the most current information.

Purpose and Advantages An Event Queue for Cache Invalidation serves as an intermediary layer that collects all cache invalidation requests and processes them asynchronously. This mechanism provides several significant benefits:

  1. Decoupling Producers and Consumers:
  1. Load Management:

    • Smooths out spikes in invalidation events by processing them at a manageable rate.
    • Prevents system overload during peak times when numerous updates might occur simultaneously.
  2. Event Coalescing and Debouncing:

    • Enables grouping multiple invalidation requests for the same cache entry within a specific time window.
    • Reduces redundant work by avoiding multiple invalidations of the same cache entry in quick succession.
  3. Historical Logging:
    • Maintains a complete record of all invalidation events.
    • Facilitates auditing, debugging, and analyzing patterns in data changes and cache usage.

Problems Without an Event Queue Without employing an event queue for cache invalidation, applications may face several challenges:

Conceptual Examples Scenario 1: E-commerce Product Updates

Scenario 2: Content Management System (CMS) Publishing

Choice of MySQL for the Event Queue We selected MySQL as the underlying storage mechanism for the event queue due to several practical reasons:

- Familiarity and Accessibility:

Alternatives and Complexity Considerations In scenarios where the volume of events is extraordinarily high, or where more advanced streaming capabilities are required, other technologies might be considered:

Why MySQL Is Often Sufficient

Conclusion Implementing an Event Queue for Cache Invalidation using MySQL strikes a balance between functionality and complexity. It provides the necessary features to handle cache invalidation efficiently in most scenarios while keeping the system architecture straightforward. By addressing the challenges of immediate processing overhead, redundant invalidations, and lack of visibility, this technique ensures that applications remain performant and maintain a high-quality user experience.

However, it's essential to assess the specific needs of your application. For extremely high-volume systems or those requiring advanced streaming capabilities, exploring alternative technologies like Kafka might be warranted, despite the increased complexity.

Coalescing Invalidation Events in Depth

In applications where data changes rapidly and frequently, managing cache invalidation efficiently becomes a significant challenge. Coalescing Invalidation Events is a technique designed to address this challenge by grouping multiple invalidation requests for the same cache key or tag within a specified time window. This approach reduces redundant cache invalidations, optimizes resource utilization, and improves overall system performance.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Reduction of Redundant Invalidations:
  1. Optimized Resource Utilization:
  1. Improved Cache Efficiency:
  1. Smoothing of Load Spikes:

Problem Without This Technique Without coalescing invalidation events, systems may encounter several issues:

  1. Cache Thrashing:
  1. Increased Backend Load:
  1. Inefficient Use of Resources:
  1. Poor User Experience:

Why Coalescing Is Effective and Performant

  1. Temporal Grouping of Events:
  1. Reduction of Processing Overhead:
  1. Balanced Data Freshness and Performance:
  1. Scalability:

Conceptual Examples Example 1: E-commerce Inventory Updates

Example 2: News Article Publishing

Implementation Details

Conclusion Coalescing invalidation events is an effective strategy for enhancing cache management in applications with frequent data changes. By grouping multiple invalidation requests and reducing redundant operations, it optimizes system performance and resource utilization. This technique addresses the core issues of cache thrashing and backend overload, providing a balanced solution that maintains data freshness without sacrificing efficiency.

Implementing coalescing requires careful consideration of the invalidation window and event grouping logic. When done correctly, it leads to a more robust, scalable, and user-friendly application, capable of handling high volumes of data changes without compromising on performance.

Debouncing Mechanism in Depth

In dynamic applications where data changes are frequent and unpredictable, managing cache invalidation efficiently is paramount to maintaining optimal performance. The Debouncing Mechanism is a technique designed to prevent the system from overreacting to rapid, successive changes by imposing a minimum time interval between cache invalidations for the same key or tag. This approach ensures that the cache is not invalidated excessively, thereby enhancing system stability and performance.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Preventing Excessive Invalidations:
  1. Optimizing Resource Utilization:

Purpose: To ensure that system resources are not wasted on processing redundant invalidations. Advantage: Frees up CPU cycles and memory for handling actual user requests and other critical operations, improving overall system throughput.

  1. Enhancing User Experience:

Purpose: To maintain a responsive application by preventing performance degradation due to constant cache rebuilding. Advantage: Users experience faster load times and a smoother interaction with the application, increasing satisfaction and engagement.

  1. Balancing Data Freshness and Performance:

Problem Without This Technique Without a debouncing mechanism, applications can face significant challenges:

  1. Cache Thrashing:
  1. System Overload:
  1. Inefficient Operations:
  1. Poor User Experience:

Differences Between Debouncing and Coalescing Invalidation While both debouncing and coalescing aim to optimize cache invalidation processes, they address the problem from different angles:

Example of Difference in Scenario:

Why Debouncing Is Effective and Performant

  1. Selective Invalidations:
  1. Resource Conservation:
  1. Improved Responsiveness:
  1. Adaptability:

Implementation Details

Conclusion The Debouncing Mechanism is a powerful tool for optimizing cache invalidation in environments with high-frequency updates to the same data points. By imposing a minimum interval between invalidations, it prevents system overload, conserves resources, and enhances user experience without significantly compromising data freshness.

While similar to coalescing in its goal to reduce redundant invalidations, debouncing differs in its approach by focusing on time-based suppression for individual identifiers rather than grouping multiple events. Understanding the nuances between these two techniques allows developers to apply them appropriately based on the specific needs and behaviors of their applications.

Handling Associated Identifiers During Invalidation in Depth

In complex applications, especially those dealing with interconnected data like e-commerce platforms, changes to one piece of data often necessitate updates to related data. Handling Associated Identifiers During Invalidation is a technique that ensures cache invalidation processes consider these relationships, maintaining data consistency and integrity across the application.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Maintaining Data Consistency:
  1. Avoiding Partial Updates:
  1. Improving User Experience:
  1. Preventing Errors and Inconsistencies:

Problem Without This Technique Without handling associated identifiers during invalidation, applications can encounter several critical issues:

  1. Stale Related Data:
  1. Broken Links and Errors:
  1. Data Integrity Issues:
  1. Increased Support and Maintenance Costs:

Detailed Example: The E-commerce PLP Sport Scenario Context:

Scenario:

  1. Initial State:

    • The PLP Sport page (plp:sport) displays a list of articles, say articles 1, 2, 3, and 7.
    • Each article has its own cache entry and is linked to the PLP Sport page.
  2. Event Occurs:
  1. Processing with Debouncing and Coalescing:

Within the Invalidation Window:

  1. Problem Without Handling Associated Identifiers:
  1. Solution with Handling Associated Identifiers:
  1. - Outcome:

Why This Technique Is Effective and Performant

  1. Ensures Data Consistency Across Related Entities:
  1. Optimizes Cache Invalidation Processes:
  1. Enhances User Experience:
  1. Reduces System Load Over Time:
  1. Provides Flexibility in Cache Invalidation Logic:

Implementation Considerations

Conclusion Handling associated identifiers during invalidation is a crucial technique for applications where data entities are interrelated. It ensures that cache invalidation processes respect these relationships, maintaining data consistency and providing a seamless user experience. By intelligently managing when and how caches are invalidated based on associations, the system effectively balances the need for up-to-date information with performance considerations.

In the PLP Sport example, this technique prevents scenarios where users might encounter 404 errors or see outdated product listings. It demonstrates the importance of considering the broader impact of data changes and highlights how thoughtful cache invalidation strategies contribute to the overall reliability and efficiency of an application.

Sharding and Parallel Processing in Depth

In high-throughput applications dealing with massive amounts of data and operations, efficiently processing tasks becomes a critical challenge. Sharding and Parallel Processing is a technique employed to divide workloads into smaller, manageable segments (shards) that can be processed concurrently. This approach significantly enhances scalability, performance, and reliability of systems that handle large volumes of events, such as cache invalidation events in a busy application.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Enhanced Scalability:
  1. Improved Performance:
  1. Balanced Load Distribution:
  1. Fault Isolation:

Problem Without This Technique Without sharding and parallel processing, systems may face several significant challenges:

  1. Processing Bottlenecks:
  1. Limited Scalability:
  1. Uneven Workload Distribution:
  1. Increased Risk of System-wide Failures:

Why Sharding and Parallel Processing Is Effective and Performant

  1. Divide and Conquer Approach:
  1. Optimized Resource Utilization:
  1. Reduced Contention and Locking:
  1. Enhanced Fault Tolerance:

If one shard or processor fails, others can continue processing unaffected. The system can reroute or retry processing for the failed shard without impacting the entire workload.

Conceptual Examples Example 1: Cache Invalidation in a High-Traffic E-commerce Platform

Example 2: Social Media Notifications

Example 3: Log Processing and Analytics

Implementation Details

  1. Shard Assignment:
  1. Configurable Shard Count:

    • The number of shards can be configured based on system capacity and performance requirements.
    • Allows for scalability by adjusting the shard count as needed.
  2. Processing Units:
  1. Load Balancing:
  1. Fault Tolerance:
  1. Data Partitioning:

Potential Challenges and Mitigations

  1. Skewed Data Distribution:
  1. Increased Complexity:
  1. Coordination Overhead:

Conclusion Sharding and Parallel Processing is a powerful technique that addresses the challenges of processing large volumes of events efficiently. By dividing workloads into smaller, manageable shards and processing them concurrently, the system achieves significant improvements in scalability, performance, and reliability.

Without this technique, systems can become bottlenecked, unable to cope with increasing demands, leading to delays, inefficiencies, and a poor user experience. Sharding allows for horizontal scaling, making it possible to handle growth seamlessly.

Implementing sharding requires careful consideration of shard assignment, load balancing, fault tolerance, and potential complexities. However, the benefits in terms of enhanced performance and system resilience make it a valuable strategy for modern applications dealing with high volumes of data and events.

By embracing sharding and parallel processing, applications can maintain high levels of performance even as they scale, ensuring that users receive timely and reliable services regardless of the system load.

Partitioning Tables in Depth

In systems that handle large volumes of data, especially those with high transaction rates like cache invalidation events, database performance can become a significant bottleneck. Partitioning Tables is a technique used to enhance database performance and manageability by dividing large tables into smaller, more manageable pieces called partitions. Each partition can be managed and accessed independently, which offers numerous advantages in terms of query performance, maintenance, and scalability.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Improved Query Performance:

    • Purpose: To reduce the amount of data scanned during query execution by narrowing the focus to relevant partitions.
    • Advantage: Queries execute faster because they only operate on a subset of data, leading to reduced I/O operations and quicker response times.
  2. Efficient Data Management:

    • Purpose: To simplify the management of large datasets by breaking them into smaller, more manageable chunks.
    • Advantage: Operations like data purging, backups, and restores can be performed on individual partitions without impacting the entire table, reducing maintenance time and system downtime.
  3. Faster Data Pruning:

    • Purpose: To enable rapid removal of old or obsolete data by dropping entire partitions instead of deleting rows individually.
    • Advantage: Dropping a partition is significantly faster than executing DELETE statements, and it avoids locking the table, thereby improving system availability.
  4. Scalability and Storage Optimization:

    • Purpose: To allow the database to handle growing data volumes efficiently.
    • Advantage: Partitions can be distributed across different storage devices, optimizing storage utilization and I/O bandwidth.
  5. Enhanced Concurrency:
    • Purpose: To reduce contention and locking issues during data modifications.
    • Advantage: Since partitions can be accessed and modified independently, multiple transactions can operate on different partitions concurrently without interfering with each other.

Problem Without This Technique

Without table partitioning, systems dealing with large tables may face several challenges:

  1. Degraded Query Performance:

    • Issue: Queries must scan the entire table, even if only a small subset of data is relevant.
    • Impact: Leads to longer query execution times, increased CPU and I/O usage, and slower application responses.
  2. Inefficient Data Purging:

    • Issue: Removing old data requires deleting rows individually.
    • Impact: DELETE operations on large tables are slow, consume significant resources, and can cause table locks that affect other operations.
  3. Maintenance Difficulties:

    • Issue: Backups, restores, and index maintenance become time-consuming and resource-intensive on large tables.
    • Impact: Increases the risk of downtime and complicates database administration tasks.
  4. Scalability Limitations:

    • Issue: The database may struggle to handle growing data volumes within a single table.
    • Impact: Leads to performance bottlenecks and may require costly hardware upgrades or complex database redesigns.
  5. Increased Risk of Data Corruption:
    • Issue: Large tables are more susceptible to corruption due to their size and the complexity of operations performed on them.
    • Impact: Data recovery becomes more challenging and time-consuming, potentially leading to significant data loss.

Why Partitioning Is Effective and Performant

  1. Selective Access Through Partition Pruning:

    • When executing a query, the database engine can determine which partitions contain the relevant data based on the partitioning key.
    • This process, known as partition pruning, allows the engine to skip irrelevant partitions entirely, reducing the amount of data scanned.
  2. Parallel Processing:

    • Operations can be performed in parallel across different partitions.
    • For example, index rebuilding or data loading can occur simultaneously on multiple partitions, speeding up maintenance tasks.
  3. Reduced Index and Data Structure Sizes:

    • Indexes on partitions are smaller than those on the entire table.
    • Smaller indexes improve search performance and reduce memory usage.
  4. Efficient Data Lifecycle Management:

    • Data retention policies can be implemented by dropping or archiving old partitions.
    • This approach is faster and less resource-intensive than deleting individual records and reorganizing the table.
  5. Improved Cache Utilization:
    • Partitioning can enhance the effectiveness of the database cache by focusing on active partitions.
    • Frequently accessed data remains in cache memory, while less active partitions do not consume cache resources unnecessarily.

Conceptual Examples

Example 1: Cache Invalidation Events Table

Example 2: User Activity Logs

Example 3: Financial Transactions

Implementation Details

  1. Choosing a Partitioning Key:

    • Select a column or expression that distributes data evenly and aligns with query patterns.
    • Common choices include date/time fields or identifiers like user IDs.
  2. Partitioning Strategies:

    • Range Partitioning: Divides data based on ranges of values, such as dates or numeric ranges.
    • List Partitioning: Uses discrete values to define partitions, suitable for categorical data.
    • Hash Partitioning: Applies a hash function to a column to evenly distribute data, useful when ranges are not suitable.
  3. Partition Management:

    • Automate the creation of new partitions and the dropping of old ones based on data lifecycle requirements.
    • Ensure that partition maintenance does not interfere with normal database operations.
  4. Indexing and Constraints:

    • Indexes and constraints can be applied to individual partitions or globally across the table.
    • Careful design is required to balance performance and data integrity.
  5. Monitoring and Optimization:
    • Regularly monitor partition sizes, query performance, and resource utilization.
    • Adjust partitioning schemes as data volume and access patterns evolve.

Potential Challenges and Mitigations

  1. Increased Complexity:

    • Challenge: Partitioning adds complexity to the database schema and maintenance processes.
    • Mitigation: Use database tools and management scripts to automate partition handling. Document partitioning strategies clearly.
  2. Application Transparency:

    • Challenge: Applications may need to be aware of partitioning to fully leverage its benefits.
    • Mitigation: Design the application to interact with the database in a way that allows the database engine to perform partition pruning transparently.
  3. Resource Management:

    • Challenge: Improper partitioning can lead to uneven data distribution and resource usage.
    • Mitigation: Analyze data access patterns and adjust the partitioning strategy accordingly. Consider using sub-partitions if necessary.
  4. Backup and Recovery Complexity:
    • Challenge: Partitioned tables may complicate backup and recovery procedures.
    • Mitigation: Develop backup strategies that account for partitioning, such as partition-level backups.

Conclusion

Partitioning tables is a powerful technique for managing large datasets effectively. By dividing tables into partitions, databases can perform queries and maintenance tasks more efficiently, leading to improved application performance and scalability. In scenarios where tables grow rapidly, such as logging cache invalidation events, partitioning becomes essential to maintain acceptable levels of performance and operational manageability.

Without partitioning, large tables can become unwieldy, causing slow queries, difficult maintenance, and scalability issues. By implementing partitioning, organizations can ensure their databases remain responsive and capable of handling increasing data volumes, ultimately providing a better experience for both users and administrators.

This technique, when combined with others like sharding and parallel processing, contributes to a robust and scalable system architecture capable of supporting high-performance applications in demanding environments.

Semaphore Locking with Redis in Depth

In distributed systems and applications that employ parallel processing, ensuring that only one process accesses or modifies a shared resource at a time is critical to maintaining data integrity and preventing race conditions. Semaphore Locking with Redis is a technique that leverages Redis's in-memory data structures to implement distributed locks (semaphores), providing a reliable and efficient way to control concurrent access across multiple processes or nodes.

Purpose and Advantages

  1. Preventing Concurrent Access Conflicts:

    • Purpose: To ensure that only one process can perform a critical section of code or access a shared resource at any given time.
    • Advantage: Avoids data corruption, inconsistent states, and race conditions that can occur when multiple processes try to modify the same resource simultaneously.
  2. Coordination Across Distributed Systems:

    • Purpose: To coordinate processes running on different machines or in different containers within a distributed environment.
    • Advantage: Provides a centralized locking mechanism that all processes can interact with, regardless of where they are running.
  3. High Performance and Low Latency:

    • Purpose: To implement locking without significant overhead or delay.
    • Advantage: Redis operates in-memory and is highly optimized for quick read/write operations, making lock acquisition and release fast.
  4. Automatic Lock Expiration:

    • Purpose: To prevent deadlocks by setting a time-to-live (TTL) on locks.
    • Advantage: Ensures that locks are automatically released if a process fails or takes too long, allowing other processes to proceed.
  5. Simplicity and Ease of Implementation:
    • Purpose: To provide a straightforward API for locking mechanisms.
    • Advantage: Redis's commands for setting and releasing locks are simple to use, reducing the complexity of implementing synchronization logic.

Problem Without This Technique

Without semaphore locking, systems that involve concurrent processing may encounter several issues:

  1. Race Conditions:

    • Issue: Multiple processes access and modify shared resources simultaneously without proper synchronization.
    • Impact: Leads to unpredictable behavior, data corruption, and difficult-to-debug errors.
  2. Data Inconsistency:

    • Issue: Operations that should be atomic are interrupted by other processes.
    • Impact: Results in partial updates or inconsistent data states that can compromise the integrity of the application.
  3. Deadlocks and Resource Starvation:

    • Issue: Processes wait indefinitely for resources held by each other.
    • Impact: The system becomes unresponsive, requiring manual intervention to resolve the deadlock.
  4. Overlapping Operations:

    • Issue: In tasks like cache invalidation, multiple processes might attempt to invalidate the same cache entries simultaneously.
    • Impact: Causes redundant work, increased load, and potential performance degradation.
  5. Inefficient Resource Utilization:
    • Issue: Without proper locking, processes may retry operations unnecessarily or encounter failures.
    • Impact: Wastes computational resources and reduces overall system throughput.

Why Semaphore Locking with Redis Is Effective and Performant

  1. Centralized Lock Management:

    • Redis serves as a central point for managing locks, accessible by all processes in the system.
    • Simplifies the coordination of distributed processes without requiring complex configurations.
  2. High-Speed In-Memory Operations:

    • Redis's in-memory data store allows for rapid execution of locking commands.
    • Minimizes the latency associated with acquiring and releasing locks, which is crucial for performance-sensitive applications.
  3. Built-In TTL for Locks:

    • Locks can be set with an expiration time to prevent deadlocks.
    • If a process holding a lock crashes or becomes unresponsive, the lock is automatically released after the TTL expires.
  4. Atomic Operations:

    • Redis provides atomic commands (e.g., SETNX, GETSET) that ensure lock operations are performed safely.
    • Eliminates the possibility of two processes acquiring the same lock simultaneously.
  5. Scalability:

    • Redis can handle a large number of connections and commands per second.
    • Suitable for applications with high concurrency requirements.
  6. Simplicity of Implementation:
    • Implementing semaphore locking with Redis requires minimal code.
    • Reduces development time and the potential for bugs compared to more complex locking mechanisms.

Conceptual Examples

Example 1: Processing Cache Invalidation Shards

Example 2: Distributed Task Scheduling

Example 3: Inventory Management in E-commerce

Implementation Details

  1. Acquiring a Lock:

    • Use the SET command with the NX (set if not exists) and EX (expire) options:
      • SET lock_key unique_identifier NX EX timeout
    • If the command returns success, the lock is acquired.
    • The unique_identifier is a value that the process can use to verify ownership when releasing the lock.
  2. Releasing a Lock:

    • Before releasing, verify that the lock is still owned by the process:
      • Use a Lua script to ensure atomicity:
        • Check if the lock's value matches unique_identifier.
        • If it matches, delete the lock.
  3. Handling Lock Expiration:

    • Set an appropriate TTL to prevent deadlocks.
    • Ensure that the TTL is longer than the maximum expected execution time of the critical section.
  4. Dealing with Failures:

    • If a process fails to acquire a lock, it can:
      • Retry after a random delay to avoid thundering herd problems.
      • Log the event and proceed with other tasks.
  5. Extending Locks:

    • If a process needs more time, it can extend the lock's TTL before it expires.
    • Requires careful handling to avoid unintentional lock releases.
  6. Choosing Lock Keys:
    • Use meaningful and unique lock keys to prevent collisions.
    • For sharded processing, the shard identifier can be part of the lock key.

Potential Challenges and Mitigations

  1. Clock Skew and Expired Locks:

    • Challenge: Differences in system clocks or network delays can cause locks to expire prematurely.
    • Mitigation: Ensure all systems use synchronized clocks (e.g., via NTP). Set conservative TTLs.
  2. Lock Loss:

    • Challenge: A process might lose a lock due to expiration while still performing the critical section.
    • Mitigation: Design the critical section to handle potential lock loss gracefully. Consider implementing a lock renewal mechanism.
  3. Single Point of Failure:

    • Challenge: Redis becomes a critical component; if it fails, locking mechanisms are compromised.
    • Mitigation: Use Redis clusters or replication for high availability. Implement fallback strategies if Redis is unavailable.
  4. Thundering Herd Problem:
    • Challenge: When a lock is released, many processes may attempt to acquire it simultaneously.
    • Mitigation: Introduce random delays or backoff strategies when retrying to acquire locks.

Conclusion

Semaphore Locking with Redis provides an effective and performant solution for controlling concurrent access in distributed systems. By utilizing Redis's fast in-memory data store and atomic operations, applications can implement robust locking mechanisms that prevent race conditions, ensure data integrity, and coordinate processes across multiple nodes.

Without such locking mechanisms, applications risk data corruption, inconsistent states, and inefficient resource utilization due to uncontrolled concurrent access. Implementing semaphore locks with Redis addresses these challenges while maintaining high performance and scalability.

This technique is particularly valuable in scenarios where tasks must not overlap, such as processing sharded workloads, executing scheduled jobs, or updating shared resources. By incorporating semaphore locking into the system architecture, developers can enhance the reliability and robustness of their applications in distributed environments.

Testing

The package includes unit tests to ensure all components function correctly. Run tests using PHPUnit:

Change log

Please see CHANGELOG for more information what has changed recently.

Testing

Contributing

Please see CONTRIBUTING for details.

Security

If you discover any security related issues, please email instead of using the issue tracker.

Credits

About Padosoft

Padosoft (https://www.padosoft.com) is a software house based in Florence, Italy. Specialized in E-commerce and web sites.

License

The MIT License (MIT). Please see License File for more information.


All versions of laravel-super-cache-invalidate with dependencies

PHP Build Version
Package Version
Requires php Version ^8.0
illuminate/support Version ^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0
laravel/framework Version ^9.0|^10.0|^11.0|^12.0
predis/predis Version ^2.0
Composer command for our command line client (download client) This client runs in each environment. You don't need a specific PHP version etc. The first 20 API calls are free. Standard composer command

The package padosoft/laravel-super-cache-invalidate contains the following files

Loading the files please wait ....